Share with your community:
In a hearing related to the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, the Supreme Court of India recently passed an interim order addressing challenges to the constitutional validity of the Act. The Apex Court denied to put a stay on the provision which provided for abolishing the concept of “Waqf by user”, while partly putting a stay on certain other provisions which were found to be arbitrary in nature. The decision of the Apex Court has led to significant implications on the property law, minority rights, and the principle of separation of powers.
Several petitioners, including those filed by Congress MP Mohammad Jawed, AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi, Maulana Arshad Madani, All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), and various other organisations, were filed in the Court challenging the amendments. It was argued in the petitions that the changes introduced targeted Muslim religious practices and violating their constitutional protections.
On the other hand, six BJP-ruled states—Haryana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, and Assam—supported the amendments, citing the need to curb fraudulent land encroachments.
The key provision which was challenged was the removal of “Waqf by user”, where properties were allowed to be declared as waqf on the basis of their long-standing community use. It was explained by the petitioners that they feared that change in the provision would help the government to seize such properties.
However, it was observed by the Court that a serious misuse has been caused, especially in the state of Andhra Pradesh, where large tracts of government land were wrongly recognised as the waqf property. The Court held that abolition of the doctrine prospectively was not arbitrary, thereby rejecting the claim that it would lead to a large-scale government takeover.
Over the topic of the inclusion of non-Muslim members in Waqf Boards as well as as the Central Waqf Council, the Court has declined to intervene. It observed that the Central Council may have up to four non-Muslim members out of 22, and State Boards may have up to three non-Muslim members out of 11.
Though, the Court specified that the Chief Executive Officer of the Waqf Board must be appointed from the Muslim community as far as possible.
The final verdict of the Court shall determine the validity of the waqf regulation in India, however the present order does underscore the role of the Court in protecting both religious freedoms and public interest.
For further information on the Subject, or to follow similar legal news, you may follow our blog under Sharks of Law or on instagram and youtube. If you are involved in a civil or criminal case and wish to talk to a lawyer online or seek free legal counsel, you may contact us through the following information.
Email:-helpdesk@sharksoflaw.com
Help Desk:-+91-88770-01993