55 Rajya Sabha Members of Parliament filed an impeachment motion against Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court in December 2024, claiming that his remarks at a Vishwa Hindu Parishad function were divisive and discriminatory against minority groups. The Indian Constitution's Articles 124(4) and 217(1)(b) allow for the removal of judges who have been found to have acted improperly or unable. A resolution must be approved by both parliamentary houses with a two-thirds majority, be investigated by a committee, and be signed by at least 50 Rajya Sabha members.
Consult Verified Legal Experts
- • Agreements
- • Audits
- • Trademark & other IP
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Audits
- • Trademark & other IP
- • Company Registration
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
- • Matrimonial Disputes
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Trademark & other IP
Experience
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
- • Startup Compliances
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Experience
- • Audits
- • Trademark & other IP
- • Company Registration
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Audits
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Matrimonial Disputes
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • RERA Matters
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Court Marriage
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Case Transfer Matters
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • RERA Matters
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Anticipatory Bail
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Company Registration
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Cyber Crime
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Matrimonial Disputes
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Audits
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
More than 55 MPs from opposition in the Upper House, i.e. the Rajya Sabha filed a notice of impeachment against the Allahabad HC Judge Shekhar Kumar Yadav to the Secretary General of the House, regarding his controversial remarks about the Muslim community at an event which was organised by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad.
Kapil Sibal, also a MP in Rajya Sabha, a signatory of the notice for impeachment as well, stated that such judges disrespecting the Constitution of India after taking an oath, must be removed from their post.
What happened till now-
The motion was put forward a few days after the Supreme Court took cognizance of the reports regarding statements made by Justice Yadav in a speech delivered by him dated 8th December.
- According to the reports, Justice Yadav made some contentious statements about the Muslim community, UCC, and also the role of majority rule in India. There are video clips of the speech made by Justice Yadav, where he showing him using slurs allegedly, as well as mention that the country must function in accordance to the wishes of majority.
- The speech included comments including, “This is Hindustan, and this country would function as per the wishes of the ‘bahusankhyak’ [majority],” as well as references to practices of triple talaq and halala, which must not be allowed.
Removal of Judges- What Does the Law Say?
- As provided under Article 124(4) of the Constitution, a Judge could be removed from office based on the grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
- The term “misbehavior” mentioned above would include such actions which undermine judicial ethics, impartiality, and affecting public trust in the judiciary.
Response from Justice Yadav
The Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court, Justice Arun Bhansali, sought response from Justice Yadav over his speech at the Vishwa Hindu Parishad event. In reply, Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav said that he stands by his remarks, which according to him were not violative of any of the principles of judicial conduct.
Previous cases of Impeachment:-
- In 1993, a motion for impeachment was brought in the Lok Sabha against V Ramaswami, which failed to secure required two-third majority in the house.
- In the year 2011, Rajya Sabha passed the motion for impeachment against Soumitra Sen from Calcutta High Court for misconduct, who was the first judge against whom the motion for impeachment was passed in the Upper House, however before the motion could be passed in the Lok Sabha, he resigned.
- Again in the year 2011, proceedings were initiated to remove Sikkim High Court Judge, PD Dinakaran, on the grounds of alleged judicial misconduct, however the proceeding were halted after his resignation.
- In the year 2015, a few MPs in the Upper House moved a motion for the removal of Gujarat High Court judge JB Pardiwala after he made some “objectionable remarks on the issue of reservation”, the motion was not followed up after the objectionable statement was removed from the judgement by the respective Judge.
- In 2017, MPs from the Rajya Sabha moved a motion initiating the impeachment proceedings against CV Nagarjuna Reddy of the Andhra Pradesh and Telangana High Court.
- In March 2018, a proposal was drafted by the opposition parties for an impeachment motion against the then CJI Dipak Misra.
For further updates on the topic, also, in case you wish to seek free legal advice or online legal counsel on matters related to civil laws, criminals or family laws, etc. you may contact us at Sharks of Law.
Email:-helpdesk@sharksoflaw.com
Help Desk:-+91-8877001993
Adv Vipul Singh Raghuwanshi
Legal expert and contributor at Sharks of Law. Committed to providing clear and accessible legal guidance to everyone.