Orissa HC rules calling husband ‘Kempa’ & ‘Nikhatu’ over disability is mental cruelty, upholds divorce under Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1) (ia).
Consult Verified Legal Experts
- • Agreements
- • Audits
- • Trademark & other IP
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Audits
- • Trademark & other IP
- • Company Registration
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
- • Matrimonial Disputes
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Trademark & other IP
Experience
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
- • Startup Compliances
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Experience
- • Audits
- • Trademark & other IP
- • Company Registration
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Audits
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Matrimonial Disputes
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • RERA Matters
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Court Marriage
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Case Transfer Matters
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • RERA Matters
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Anticipatory Bail
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Company Registration
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Cyber Crime
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Matrimonial Disputes
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Audits
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
In a landmark judgment, the Orissa High Court has stated that making fun of one's spouse due to his physical infirmity and calling such derogatory names as 'Kempa' (cripple) and 'Nikhatu' (useless) should be deemed mental cruelty, validly constituting grounds for divorce as per Section 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This decision attaches utmost importance to mutual respect in marital relationships and protection against psychological abuse within marriage.
Background of the Case
- The marriage between the appellant-wife and respondent-husband was solemnized on June 1, 2016, as per Hindu rites. According to the husband, almost immediately after marriage, the wife took to making demeaning comments about his physical disability on a regular basis. Matters took an ugly turn when the wife vacated the matrimonial home in September 2016, only to return in January 2017 after interventions by families.
- The relationship did not improve, however. The wife is said to have continued with her derogatory comments about the husband's physique, seriously disturbing domestic harmony. Eventually, she left the matrimonial home again in March 2018 and subsequently filed a criminal complaint under Section 498A IPC, accusing the husband and his family of cruelty.
- Keeping the husband in continued mental agony, he prayed for the decree of divorce in April 2019 before the Family Court, Puri, which held that dissatisfied with the divorce decree, the wife filed a matrimonial appeal with the Orissa High Court after subjecting her husband to mental abuse.
Court’s Observations and Findings
- The Division Bench of Justices Bibhu Prasad Routray and Chittaranjan Dash upheld the decree of the Family Court.
- The Court noted that the husband was physically handicapped, a fact that remained undisputed on record; that according to him, the wife humiliated him by calling him names such as 'Kempa' and 'Nikhatu', a witness examining in favour of the husband fully corroborated his testimony, whereas the wife during cross-examination failed to effectively challenge or disprove the allegations.
- The Court held that such derogatory remarks made in respect of the husband's physical condition amount to mental cruelty, and that is one of the grounds that the law recognizes even as sufficient for divorce. The judges quoted leading Supreme Court rulings, including in V. Bhagat v. D. Bhagat (Mrs) and Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh, which have held that mental cruelty constitutes any acts causing mental pain or suffering in a spouse.
- The Bench opined that mutual respect and emotional support should be the cornerstones of a marital relationship. The constant reference to the husband's physical infirmity by the wife demonstrated a clear lack of empathy for him and was sufficient to cause him psychological distress.
- Accordingly, the High Court was of the view that the inhuman treatment to the husband amounted to cruelty and accordingly affirmed the decree of divorce.
Observations on Alimony and Streedhan
- The wife had also challenged the Family Court’s refusal to grant permanent alimony and its action in not returning her streedhan. The High Court, however, declined to make detailed observations on these points due to the lack of sufficiently probative materials as to the financial positions of the parties.
- On the basis of sufficient documents and financial disclosures, the High Court did grant the wife the right to independently petition the Family Court on the particularly restricted issues of streedhan recovery as well as perpetual alimony.
Legal Significance
- This judgment has basically established that mental cruelty which includes emotional and verbal abuse vis-à-vis physical disabilities constitutes grounds for divorce and civil remedy for the aggrieved spouse. It further bolsters the principle that marriage being not only a social contract is essentially a relationship that demands some emotional sensitivity, empathy, and respect.
- By including derogatory language under the umbrella of "cruelty," the Court has afforded protection to those who undergo non-physical yet equally detrimental forms of abuse.
The Orissa High Court’s decision in X v. Y (MATA No. 264 of 2023) highlights that emerging judicial views acknowledge and consider mental cruelty as warranted and adequate for filing a divorce. Verbal cruelty besieged by epithets like 'Kempa' and 'Nikhatu' hurled by a spouse against another who is physically handicapped was rightly acknowledged as an act of cruelty to justify dissolution of the marriage.
The judgment stresses again on the sanctity of regard and respect in matrimonial life and strikes down loud and clear that any form of verbal humiliation aimed at mocking a disability of the spouse would never find solace in Indian law.
Sharks of Law offers a comprehensive legal solutions facility, providing an extensive collection of information on diverse areas of law in the legal field by the best professionals in this area. With this law firm, you can search and find a lawyer who can meet your legal requirements for online consultation. The attorneys at Sharks of Law have the necessary expertise across all the fields involved should you have any inquiries that require legal counsel.
Email:-helpdesk@sharksoflaw.com
Help Desk:-+91-88770-01993
Adv Vipul Singh Raghuwanshi
Legal expert and contributor at Sharks of Law. Committed to providing clear and accessible legal guidance to everyone.