The Supreme Court upheld the Rajasthani government's two-child eligibility prerequisite for government job applications, ruling that the requirement is neither discriminatory nor unconstitutional.
Consult Verified Legal Experts
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Audits
- • Trademark & other IP
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Audits
- • Trademark & other IP
- • Company Registration
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
- • Matrimonial Disputes
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Trademark & other IP
Experience
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
- • Startup Compliances
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Experience
- • Audits
- • Trademark & other IP
- • Company Registration
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Audits
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Matrimonial Disputes
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • RERA Matters
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Court Marriage
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Bail Matter
- • Consumer Protection
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • RERA Matters
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Anticipatory Bail
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Company Registration
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Cyber Crime
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Matrimonial Disputes
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Audits
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
The government of Rajasthan has most recently instituted a policy that hinders individuals who have more than 2 child policy in Rajasthan from obtaining government jobs, an initiative that resulted in considerable discussion and controversy. This decision, which is intended to slow down the increase in population, has brought about a lot of debate about its moral, social, and practical implications.
The opponents denounce it as unfair and a violation of reproductive rights, while backers contend that it must be done to address asset strain and overpopulation.
What is the Two Child Policy in India?
- "Hum Do Hamare Do" became well-known in the 1980s thanks to a widespread campaign. It's becoming a bigger concern. The nation's resources and total land area are finite, and its population is growing quickly. We are the world's second-most populous nation. It also poses a significant challenge to the government's ability to provide benefits and subsidies.
- India's population is increasing and will do so for the ensuing few decades. The higher percentage of individuals in the marriable age group who will have children is the cause of this fact. Future generations will face numerous issues as a result of the population explosion. The population explosion will lead to many problems for future generations. Natural resources like water, air, land, forests, etc. are overused as a consequence of overpopulation. Restricting the expansion of the population is more crucial than ever in the modern era.
Why in the News Today?
The Supreme Court upheld the Rajasthan Govt Two Child policy eligibility requirement for public job applications, ruling that the requirement is neither discriminatory nor unconstitutional.
What Does the Provision Describing the 2 Child Policy in Rajasthan Say?
- Ram Lal Jat, an ex-serviceman who retired in 2017 and applied to become a constable in the Rajasthan Police in 2018, filed the plea.
- The Rajasthan Various Service (Amendment) Rules, 2001 state that a candidate cannot be appointed to the service if, on or after June 1, 2002, they have more than two children according to the Rajasthan Govt Two Child policy.
- The bench concluded that Rule 24(4) of the Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989, which states that a candidate whose number of children exceeds two on June 1, 2002, is not discriminatory and does not contravene the Constitution, is lawful.
Observation by the High Court
- The High Court declined to intervene in the authorities' decision regarding the 2 child policy in Rajasthan that disqualified Jat, stating that it is a matter of policy and does not call for judicial intervention.
Decision by the Supreme Court
- Justice Surya Kant, Justice Diapankar Datta, and Justice K V Vishwanathan of the Supreme Court bench denied Jat's appeal, arguing that there was no reason to interfere with the High Court's decision. Since June 1, 2002, candidates who have more than two living children are not eligible for government jobs due to the Rajasthan Govt Two Child policy rule.
- The judges emphasized that the "two-child norm" is a matter of policy and that the court should not get involved. The decision upholds the state's right to establish eligibility requirements for public employment that take demographics into account.
- The Supreme Court has further established the legal validity of policies that seek to promote family planning by endorsing the "two-child norm" for government jobs, reaffirming its position on similar measures embraced for electoral candidates.
Rajasthan's decision-making to bar families with more than two children from government jobs emphasizes the complex connection that exists between social justice, rights for individuals, and the control of the population. While the policy seeks to tackle urgent problems with demographics, serious ethical and practical issues are raised by its repressive nature and the possibility of discrimination.
In order to uphold individual autonomy and move forward with sustainable growth, society must adopt inclusive, rights-centered strategies as it is struggling with the obstacles of population management.
Sharks of Law is a one-stop legal destination of various legal trending news. You can scroll through various news updates at your own convenience. To get more such blogs to keep yourself updated stay tuned with Sharks of Law.
Email:-helpdesk@sharksoflaw.com
Help Desk:-+91-88770-01993
Adv Vipul Singh Raghuwanshi
Legal expert and contributor at Sharks of Law. Committed to providing clear and accessible legal guidance to everyone.