Dated 11-08-2025, a two-judge Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan directed the concerned authorities to move stray dogs in the Delhi NCR region to shelters.
Consult Verified Legal Experts
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
- • Startup Compliances
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Experience
- • Audits
- • Trademark & other IP
- • Company Registration
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Corporate Issues
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Audits
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Matrimonial Disputes
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Experience
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • RERA Matters
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Bail Matter
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Court Marriage
Experience
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Cyber Crime
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Property Matter
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
Experience
- • Agreements
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Case Transfer Matters
Experience
- • Insurance Matters
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • RERA Matters
Experience
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Cyber Crime
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Anticipatory Bail
Experience
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Company Registration
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Cyber Crime
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Matrimonial Disputes
- • Legal Notice
Experience
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Audits
- • Cheque Bounce
Experience
As the news has already been in headlines for a few days now, the Supreme Court of India, recently initiated suo motu proceedings for the case titled In Re. City Hounded by Strays, Kids Pay Price after an article was published by the Times of India dated 28-07-2025. The report mentioned the alarming statistics related to the attacks by the stray dog, especially those which took place in the Delhi National Capital Region (NCR), which are an average of 2,000 dog bite cases per day in Delhi only.
The Apex Court recognising the issue expressed deep concerns over the issue especially for vulnerable groups including young children, elderly, as well as visually impaired individuals—who are at grave risks when navigating public streets.
Transfer of the Case to a Larger Bench
- Dated 11-08-2025, a two-judge Bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan directed the concerned authorities to move stray dogs in the Delhi NCR region to shelters. However, the directions were challenged as the decision of the Bench was found to be in conflict with prior orders from the Supreme Court.
- As a result, the case was then transferred to a three-judge Bench including Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria, which has reserved its decision
Observations by the Court
- It was emphasised by the Court that the matter was being considered after a continuous systemic failure by the authorities and not on mere impulse. The Court further stressed that the streets should not be places of fear and vulnerability.
- “We are conscious and sensitive of co-existence. The idea behind co-existence is not the existence of one’s life at the cost of another.” The Apex Court pointed out that no individual is below the law, highlighting the duty of the judiciary to safeguard the dignity of all citizens, especially those who have been living in poverty and are unable to access medical treatments for these dog bites.
- Also, the Court expressed that while it respected genuine concern for animal welfare, virtue signaling won’t be validated. The Court called on the citizens to take personal responsibilities for the stray dogs by adopting them or supporting the numerous animal shelters rather than leaving the burden on the government completely.
Supreme Court Directions as Were Issued on 11-08-2025
1. Immediate action is required to be taken on the Stray Dogs
- The Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Gurugram, and Faridabad Authorities have been directed to catch these stray dogs, from high-risk areas especially.
- For the process a special task force could be formed, and that any obstruction to this process shall be dealt with strict legal consequences.
2. Shelters to be Created-
- Authorities are required to establish shelters/pounds across the NCR within a period of 8 weeks.
- These shelters should be properly staffed, with appropriate medical care, as well as facilities of sterilisation, immunisation, CCTV monitoring, and there shall be no overcrowding.
3. Strict guidelines were issued for welfare-
- No cruelty is permitted as the dogs should be treated in a humanely manner
- Also special provisions were ordered for weak or vulnerable dogs to be kept separately when possible.
4. Not to be Re-released to the Streets
- As per the directions from the Supreme Court in the order passed on 11th Aug, these dogs cannot be released and must be sheltered permanently, and should be marked and tracked.
5. Helpline & Response System to be established
- The related authorities have been directed by the Apex Court to issue a helpline within a week.
- When a complaint of dog bite is received, such dog must be captured within four hours. Non-compliance of these guidelines shall result in court proceedings.
6. Medical treatments-
- Victims of these dog bites should be provided with immediate medical attention, and a monthly report regarding the availability of genuine rabies vaccine should be released regularly.
7. Regulations regarding the Adoptions of dogs-
- Adoptions of the dogs shall take place under the Standard Protocol for Adoption of Community Animals (2022) only.
- Such adopted dog could not be returned to public spaces.
Case in the Delhi HC Matter Merged
A similar case which was pending before the Delhi High Court, titled Parthima Devi v. MCD, was transferred to the Supreme Court due to overlapping issues.
Final Verdict- Pending
Dated 14-08-2025, the three-judge Bench reserved its order on the pleas challenging the above mentioned August 11 directions.
The matter shall be heard again in four weeks, when a comprehensive status report would be submitted from all concerned authorities.
For further information on the Subject, or to follow similar legal news, you may follow our blog under Sharks of Law or on instagram and youtube. If you are involved in a civil or criminal case and wish to talk to a lawyer online or seek free legal counsel, you may contact us through the following information.
Email:-helpdesk@sharksoflaw.com
Help Desk:-+91-88770-01993
Adv Vipul Singh Raghuwanshi
Legal expert and contributor at Sharks of Law. Committed to providing clear and accessible legal guidance to everyone.