Karnataka HC Quashes Husband Divorce Over Wrong Details Of Wife

In an important ruling emphasizing the importance of fairness in matrimonial proceedings, the Karnataka High Court has set aside an ex-parte divorce decree granted in favour of the husband. It held that the husband had misled the Family Court by giving an incorrect address of the wife so that she may not have any opportunity to participate in the proceedings. The High Court sent the matter back for a fresh adjudication before the Family Court and directed that both parties should appear at the next hearing. 

Background of the Case

The husband had gone before the Family Court at Hubballi for dissolution of marriage. However, proceedings took place without any participation by the wife because the husband had allegedly given an incorrect residential address of the wife. Thereafter, the Family Court proceeded ex parte and pronounced divorce solely on the grounds of the husband's presentation.

Wife’s Plea Before the High Court

• On discovering the divorce decree, the wife challenged the ex parte order before the Karnataka High Court. She asserted that the husband had deliberately given a false address in the divorce petition. He was said to have given his wife's address as "Shironi" in Rajasthan instead of the right one "Sirohi". Thereby, he managed to get the notice endorsement as "refused", and the court was being misled into believing that the wife had actually been served.
• The wife further contended that she was residing at her parental home in Sirohi, Rajasthan, and had even initiated separate proceedings there seeking restitution of conjugal rights. The wife came to know about the divorce in these proceedings that she had initiated against her husband. She procured a certified copy of the judgment of the Family Court and thereupon came to know that the court had actually passed a decree on the basis of wrong particulars without giving her a chance to enter into pleadings against her husband.

High Court’s Observations

• The appellate High Court noted irregularities in the proceedings below-the case. Contrary to an earlier order by the appellate High Court directing the husband to be personally present, his counsel reported verbally that he had been unable to get hold of his client. Both mobile numbers which were given to his counsel were said to have been in switched-off mode and that the whereabouts of the husband were then not known.
• The Court held that the divorce had been granted without proper appreciation of and without complying with statutory procedure. Due to the absence of an opportunity to present evidence and the distortion of facts on record, the divorce decree was set aside.

Directions of the High Court

In the final judgment of the Court, the High Court of Karnataka has remanded the matter to the Family Court at Hubballi for fresh consideration with directions to the said Family Court. The directions laid down include:

• Date of Next Hearing: The remanded case shall be heard on 20.9.2019.
• Consideration of Maintenance: On that day itself, maintenance for the wife and the minor child born out of the marriage shall be considered by the Family Court. 
• Personal Appearance: Both parties, who are now represented by counsel, have been directed to be physically present before the Family Court to avoid any further delay in proceedings.

Significance of the Ruling

• One might say this case highlights the judiciary's emphasis on procedural fairness and just outcomes in family law. The order acts as a warning against misrepresenting facts before the court. Another significant point is that one spouse cannot deprive the other spouse of rights, notably the right to reply and to participate in proceedings.
• Further, the judgment is child-caring, ensuring that time is not lost before the child has to face the consequences of a decision that materially affects his/her future and maintenance. 

The Karnataka High Court's ruling to set aside a divorce for fraud sets an unambiguous precedent. It serves as a reminder to litigants that if the law is abused for the unfair advantage of one party over another, the consequences could well be grave. By following the principles of maintenance and welfare of the child in due course, the very basis of justice in matrimonial disputes is questioned.

As the case now returns to the Family Court for a fresh hearing, the focus will be on ensuring that both parties get a fair opportunity to present their case, and the legal process is followed in letter and spirit.

Sharks of Law offers a comprehensive legal solutions facility, providing an extensive collection of information on diverse areas of law in the legal field by the best professionals in this area. With this law firm, you can search and find a lawyer who can meet your legal requirements for online consultation. The attorneys at Sharks of Law have the necessary expertise across all the fields involved should you have any inquiries that require legal counsel.

Email:-helpdesk@sharksoflaw.com

Help Desk:-+91-88770-01993