The Madhya Pradesh High Court denied a petition for police protection for a couple as it observed that the marriage between a Muslim man and a Hindu woman shall not be valid under the Muslim personal law.
Consult Verified Legal Experts
Adv. Suresh Tripathi
Supreme Court of India
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
PRAYAGRAJ
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Tanya Bansal
Supreme Court of India
- • RERA Matters
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Ghaziabad
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Karan Khanna
Supreme Court of India
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Model Town
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Reena Saxena
Supreme Court of India
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Kanpur
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Vinayak Patil
Supreme Court of India
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Pune City
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Sneha Naidu
Supreme Court of India
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
- • Startup Compliances
Hyderabad
20-25+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Akash Yadav
Supreme Court of India
- • Cyber Crime
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
GURUGRAM
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Pooja Iyer
Supreme Court of India
- • Audits
- • Trademark & other IP
- • Company Registration
Chennai
20-25+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Rajiv Malhotra
Supreme Court of India
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Karol Bagh
20-25+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Megha Shah
Supreme Court of India
- • Cyber Crime
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Ahmadabad City
20-25+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Ankit Jain
Supreme Court of India
- • RERA Matters
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
Vijaypur
20-25+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Simran Kaur
Supreme Court of India
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Legal Notice
Ludhiana (East)
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Manish Tyagi
Supreme Court of India
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Noida
10-15+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Harsh Chauhan
Supreme Court of India
- • Cyber Crime
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Dehradun
20-25+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Nikita Arora
Supreme Court of India
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Amritsar -I
+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Deepika Mishra
Supreme Court of India
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Varanasi
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Sakshi Bansal
Supreme Court of India
- • Consumer Protection
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Ghaziabad
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Rohit Aggarwal
Supreme Court of India
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
Preet Vihar
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Pooja Saxena
Supreme Court of India
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Cyber Crime
Noida
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Arjun Nair
Supreme Court of India
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Kochi
20-25+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Kavita Reddy
Supreme Court of India
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Hyderabad
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Sandeep Yadav
Supreme Court of India
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Gurgaon
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Anjali Kapoor
Supreme Court of India
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
ROHINI
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Vikram Singh
Supreme Court of India
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Chandigarh
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Neha Gupta
Supreme Court of India
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
Jaipur
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Amit Verma
Supreme Court of India
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
Lucknow
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Priya Mehta
Supreme Court of India
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Property Matter
- • Corporate Issues
MUMBAI
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Rahul Sharma
Supreme Court of India
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Rape & POCSO
Vivek Vihar
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Fatima Begum
Supreme Court of India
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Corporate Issues
Jaipur
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Gurpreet Singh
Supreme Court of India
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Bangalore North
10-15+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Sai Chatterjee
Supreme Court of India
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Audits
MUMBAI
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Diya Saxena
Supreme Court of India
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
Jaipur
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Simran Sharma
Supreme Court of India
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Bail Matter
Vivek Vihar
20-25+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Priya Nair
Supreme Court of India
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Rape & POCSO
Gandhi Nagar
20-25+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Ayaan Verma
Supreme Court of India
- • Matrimonial Disputes
- • Legal Notice
- • Succession Issue
Pune City
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Sai Jain
Supreme Court of India
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Money Recovery
Parliament Street
20-25+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Kabir Saxena
Supreme Court of India
- • Cyber Crime
- • Money Recovery
- • Cheque Bounce
Chandigarh
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Harpreet Patel
Supreme Court of India
- • Insurance Matters
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
Amritsar -I
10-15+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Sai Mehta
Supreme Court of India
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Bangalore North
10-15+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Zoya Das
Supreme Court of India
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Ahmadabad City
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Kunal Banerjee
Supreme Court of India
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
KOLKATA
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Nazia Begum
Supreme Court of India
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • Statutory Compliances
NALGONDA
1-5+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Jaspreet Singh
Supreme Court of India
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Mutual or Contested Divorce
Amritsar -I
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Priya Nair
Supreme Court of India
- • Agreements
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
Trivandrum
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Joseph DSouza
Supreme Court of India
- • Agreements
- • Employment Matters
- • RERA Matters
PANAJI
10-15+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Karthik Raman
Supreme Court of India
- • Employment Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Cyber Crime
Alandur
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Sana Mirza
Supreme Court of India
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • Cyber Fraud
Parola
10-15+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Aarav Sharma
Supreme Court of India
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
DELHI CITY
10-15+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Arshdeep Gill
Supreme Court of India
- • Bail Matter
Hungund
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Kavita Pandey
Supreme Court of India
- • Rape & POCSO
Ghaziabad
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Neeraj Goswami
Supreme Court of India
- • Insurance Matters
Chengannur
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Rahul Deshmukh
Supreme Court of India
- • Adoption & Custody
Tiruttani
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Gurpreet Chawla
Supreme Court of India
- • Court Marriage
Chengalpattu
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Saurabh Ahuja
Supreme Court of India
- • RERA Matters
- • Case Transfer Matters
- • Cyber Crime
chamalekha
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Vikram Dhillon
Supreme Court of India
- • Rape & POCSO
MOHALI
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Amandeep Grewal
Supreme Court of India
- • Insurance Matters
Nakodar
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Gurmeet Brar
Supreme Court of India
- • Rape & POCSO
Chhachhrauli
10-15+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Anjali Goel
Supreme Court of India
- • Adoption & Custody
Noida
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Meenakshi Iyer
Supreme Court of India
- • Property Matter
Ambur
10-15+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Karthik Reddy
Supreme Court of India
- • Property Matter
Bangalore North
+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Jaspreet Sandhu
Supreme Court of India
- • Adoption & Custody
Chandigarh
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Ffj jvhgv
Supreme Court of India
- • Agreements
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Case Transfer Matters
Delhi Cantonment
10++
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Fatima Khan
Supreme Court of India
- • Insurance Matters
Jaipur
+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Gurpreet Sharma
Supreme Court of India
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • RERA Matters
Bangalore North
+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Pooja Jain
Supreme Court of India
- • Court Marriage
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Legal Notice
MUMBAI
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Krishna Agarwal
Supreme Court of India
- • Cyber Crime
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Anticipatory Bail
Karnah
15-20+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Swati Singh
Supreme Court of India
- • Rape & POCSO
- • Bail Matter
- • Legal Notice
DELHI CITY
10-15+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Kunwar Gangesh
Supreme Court of India
- • Employment Matters
- • Company Registration
- • Legal Notice
DELHI CITY
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Chitra Bhanu Gupta
Supreme Court of India
- • Cyber Fraud
- • Cyber Crime
- • Legal Notice
KOLKATA
20-25+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Mahideep Singh
Supreme Court of India
- • Employment Matters
- • Insurance Matters
- • Legal Notice
Dehradun
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Soumi Guha Thakurta
Supreme Court of India
- • Adoption & Custody
- • Matrimonial Disputes
- • Legal Notice
KOLKATA
5-10+
Years of
Experience
Experience
Adv. Kanchan Kumari
Supreme Court of India
- • Anticipatory Bail
- • Audits
- • Cheque Bounce
MUMBAI
7+
Years of
Experience
Experience
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in a recent development, denied a petition titled X & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. for police protection for a couple as it observed that marriage between a Muslim man and a Hindu woman shall not be valid under the Muslim personal law. The couple had applied for police protection so as to register their inter-faith marriage under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Facts of the Case-
- A couple, where the woman follows the Hindu faith and the man is a muslim, approached the High Court, while seeking police protection in order to appear before the marriage officer so as to get their marriage registered under the Special Marriage Act
- The couple applied for police protection for their concerns of social boycott and after the family of the woman opposed the relationship claiming that the women took jewellery from the house when she left the house to get married.
- The counsel for the couple, Dinesh Kumar Upadhayay, informed the Court that the couple did not wish to convert their religion, also that the marriage between the couple as per the personal law would not be valid, the couple could get married legally under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
- The Counsel for the couple, argued that a marriage under the Special Marriage Act will override the personal law. Hence making the marriage under Special Marriage Act as valid.
Observations by the High Court
- The Court observed that such marriage which is otherwise prohibited under the personal law would not be legal under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. Also, Section 4 of the Special Marriage Act provides that a a marriage shall be valid only if the parties to the marriage do not fall within prohibited relationship.
- Further, the Court observed that the couple was not willing to be in a live-in relationship nor the woman wishes to convert to Islam.
- The Court noted that the as per the above mentioned circumstances, there is no case for interference on Court’s part.
- The Bench of Justice Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia observed that a marriage between a Muslim man and a Hindu woman shall be treated as an “irregular (fasid) marriage” according to the Muslim personal law even when the couple got married under the Special Marriage Act.
- The Court held that according to the Mahomedan law, marriage of a Muslim boy with such a girl who is a fire-worshipper or an idolatress, would not be a valid marriage. Also, even when such marriage has been registered under the Special Marriage Act, it shall not be a valid marriage but an irregular (fasid) marriage.
- The Court pointed out that marriages under Special Marriage Act could be solemnised without having to follow such customs which shall be necessary under the personal laws, however the Act does not legalise such marriages which would be prohibited under the personal laws.
- Mentioning the precedent in the case of Mohammed Salim v Shamsudeen by the Apex Court, the Court held that in the present case, marriage would be irregular as per the Muslim law.
Sharks of Law offers you a team of experienced advocates who understand the importance of you cases for you and help you deal with them earnestly. Thus, if you wish to talk to a lawyer for legal consultation, you may contact us.
Email:-helpdesk@sharksoflaw.com
Help Desk:-+91-88770-01993
Adv Vipul Singh Raghuwanshi
Legal expert and contributor at Sharks of Law. Committed to providing clear and accessible legal guidance to everyone.
